Is Vaping Health Risky?
Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. It also means that they’re taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand vapinger.com smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the unwanted effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past couple of years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are various reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we must do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the number of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.